1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 264 F.3d
  5. 264 F.3d 1326 (2001)
 

KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC. v. APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC.

No. 99-1564.

264 F.3d 1326 (2001)

KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. and John L. Aker, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied: October 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D.A.N. Chase, Chase & Yakimo, L.C., of Overland Park, KS, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was Michael Yakimo, Jr.

Ronald Craig Fish, Falk & Fish, LLP, of Morgan Hill, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Thomas H. Stahl and Gerald A. King, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, of Kansas City, MO.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Kustom Signals, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, granting summary judgment of noninfringement of United States Patent No. 5,528,246 issued June 19, 1996, entitled "Traffic Radar with Digital Signal Processing." We affirm the judgment of the district court.1

BACKGROUND

Traffic radar equipment emits radio signals that bounce off target...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases