1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 254 F.3d
  5. 254 F.3d 1334 (2001)
 

GART v. LOGITECH, INC.

No. 00-1088.

254 F.3d 1334 (2001)

Samuel GART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOGITECH, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied August 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Re, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Newport Beach, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was William R. Zimmerman.

William L. Anthony, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Terrence P. McMahon, Eric L. Wesenberg, and Rowena Y. Young.

Before LOURIE, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

On cross motions for summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "district court") determined that Logitech, Inc. ("Logitech") does not infringe claim 7 of Samuel Gart's ("Gart") U.S. Patent No. 4,862,165 (the "'165 patent") either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Gart v. Logitech, Inc., No. CV 98-5957 CBM (C.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 1999) ("Gart I") (claim construction and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases