1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 248 F.3d
  5. 248 F.3d 1333 (2001)
 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY v. TCI CABLEVISION

No. 00-1236.

248 F.3d 1333 (2001)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided May 7, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Zaslowsky, and Robin L. Filion, Baker & McKenzie, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee. On the brief were David Zaslowsky, and James David Jacobs. Of counsel was Frank M. Gasparo.

Scott F. Partridge, Baker Botts L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Roger S. Donley. Also on the brief were Neil P. Sirota, of New York, New York; and David G. Willie, and Samir A. Bhavsar, of Dallas, Texas.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. ("TCI-California") appeals the January 27, 2000 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 99-CV-2982 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 27, 2000). The district court granted the motion filed by Intellectual Property Development, Inc. ("IPD") and Communications Patents Ltd. ("CPL") to dismiss its complaint against TCI-California with prejudice and to dismiss TCI-California's counterclaims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases