1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 265 F.3d
  5. 265 F.3d 1311 (2001)
 

FIN CONTROL SYTEMS PTY, LTD. v. OAM, INC.

No. 00-1516.

265 F.3d 1311 (2001)

FIN CONTROL SYSTEMS PTY, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin J. Trupiano, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert A. Vanderhye, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., of Arlington, VA, argued for defendant-appellee.

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

This is a patent infringement case in which Fin Control Systems Pty, Ltd. ("FCS") appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Fin Control Sys. Pty, Ltd. v. OAM, Inc., No. CV-99-7037 (C.D.Cal. July 10, 2000). The district court ruled on summary judgment that OAM, Inc. does not infringe United States Patent No. 5,464,359 ("the '359 patent"), either literally or under the doctrine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases