1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 766 A.2d
  5. 766 A.2d 803 (2001)
 

HIRTH v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

766 A.2d 803 (2001)

337 N.J. Super. 149

Mitchell HIRTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Seltzer, Hoboken, argued the cause for appellant.

Linda Sabat argued the cause for respondent (Murray, Murray & Corrigan, attorneys; Ms. Sabat, of counsel and on the brief; William E. Denver, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CONLEY and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal involves a challenge to a City of Hoboken ordinance which adopted a redevelopment plan for a section of the City.

In 1997, the Hoboken City Council adopted a resolution which authorized the Planning Board (Board) to conduct a preliminary investigation of an industrial area in the northwest section of the City to determine whether the area was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases