1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 247 F.3d
  5. 247 F.3d 1316 (2001)
 

TELEMAC CELLULAR CORP. v. TOPP TELECOM, INC.

No. 99-1562.

247 F.3d 1316 (2001)

TELEMAC CELLULAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOPP TELECOM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied June 1, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy W. Chambers, Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Roger L. Cook.

Daniel A. DeVito, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Carolyn H. Blankenship. Of counsel on the brief were David W. Hansen, and Benjamin R. Ostapuk, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of Palo Alto, California.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 1, 2001.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Telemac Cellular Corporation ("Telemac") appeals from a grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California finding claims 1, 4, 6, 9, 18, 20-24, 29 and 30 of Telemac's U.S. Patent No. 5,577,100 ("the '100 patent") invalid and not infringed by the TRACFONE system. Telemac Cellular Corp., v. Topp Telecom, Inc., No. 98-CV-22 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases