1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 768 A.2d
  5. 768 A.2d 779 (2001)
 

SOMERVILLE BD. OF EDUC. v. MANVILLE BD. OF EDUC.

768 A.2d 779 (2001)

167 N.J. 55

SOMERVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MANVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Rubin, Metuchen, argued the cause for appellant.

Allan P. Dzwilewski, Florham Park, argued the cause for respondent (Schwartz Simon Edelstein Celso & Kessler, attorneys; Nathanya G. Simon, of counsel; Mr. Dzwilewski and Lisa M. Michura, on the brief).

Michelle Lyn Miller, Deputy Attorney General, submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amicus curiae, New Jersey Department of Education (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Wecker's thoughtful and comprehensive opinion. Somerville Bd. of Educ. v. Manville Bd. of Educ., 332 N.J.Super. 6, 752 A.2d 793 (2000). We add only these brief comments.

The Appellate Division determined that the Somerville and Manville school districts should continue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases