PER CURIAM.
Matthew Earle initiated this action when the State refused to "dismiss with prejudice the criminal information filed ... on November 14, 2000" pursuant to a written plea agreement entered into by both parties and fully performed by Earle. The State argues that by filing an amended information that omitted the crime charged in the earlier information, the amended information operated as a nolle prosequi of the earlier charges. Thus, the State asserts dismissal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
