1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 250 F.3d
  5. 250 F.3d 1289 (2001)
 

SHAW v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

No. 99-16859.

250 F.3d 1289 (2001)

Michael SHAW, Plaintiff, and Fred L. Arthur, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento Police Department; Joseph Serna; Arturo Venegas, Jr., Chief, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 10, 2001.

Amended June 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo F. Donahue, Gold River, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas A. Cregger, Barry & Randolph, Sacramento, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: Mary M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, J. Clifford WALLACE and Richard C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Deputy Chief of Police Fred Arthur (ret.) appeals the district court's judgment following a jury special verdict in an age and race discrimination action he brought against his former employer, the City of Sacramento ("City"). The jury found discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov't.Code § 12965, but found also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases