PEPE v. TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD


766 A.2d 771 (2001)

337 N.J. Super. 94

Joseph PEPE, III, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD, a Municipal Corporation in the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 26, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan C. Roth, argued the cause for appellant (Ruderman & Glickman, attorneys; Mark S. Ruderman, Springfield, of counsel; Mr. Ruderman and Mr. Roth, on the brief).

Robert F. Renaud, Cranford, argued the cause for respondent (Palumbo & Renaud, attorneys; Mr. Renaud, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME and CARCHMAN.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by defendant Springfield Township from an order of the Law Division dismissing disciplinary charges filed against plaintiff, Joseph Pepe, a firefighter with the Springfield Fire Department (the Department). Following a disciplinary hearing resulting in his conviction and a three-month suspension without pay, plaintiff filed a de novo appeal in the Law Division pursuant to N.J.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases