1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 784 A.2d
  5. 784 A.2d 741 (2001)
 

ZACHARIAS v. WHATMAN PLC

784 A.2d 741 (2001)

345 N.J. Super. 218

John ZACHARIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHATMAN PLC, Whatman Reeve Angel Inc., Whatman Inc., Whatman Specialty Products Inc., Edward Libbey and Lewis Metts, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy Erika Smith, Montclair, argued the cause for appellant (Smith Mullin, attorneys; Ms. Smith, on the brief).

William H. Ewing of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for respondents (Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Paul M. Colwell and Frank J. Kontely III, Roseland, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WEFING and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

On March 25, 1997, plaintiff John Zacharias filed a complaint in the Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, alleging that his long-time employer, defendant Whatman P.L.C., had terminated his employment because of his age in contravention of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to 10:5-28, specifically 10:5-4. In the four and a half years since, there has been no address...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases