1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 239 F.3d
  5. 239 F.3d 1280 (2001)
 

SCHISM v. U.S.

No. 99-1402

239 F.3d 1280 (2001)

William O. Schism and Robert L. Reinlie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED February 8, 2001

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Day, Day and Meade, P.A., of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

E. Roy Hawkens, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Barbara C. Biddle.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

MAYER, Chief Judge.

William O. Schism and Robert L. Reinlie (the retirees) appeal the grant of summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida in favor of the government that they are not entitled to free, lifetime health care, and the denial of summary judgment to the retirees. The district court also denied their motion for certification of a class of all military retirees, aged 65 and over, who are receiving social security...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases