1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 783 A.2d
  5. 783 A.2d 724 (2001)
 

CARTER v. REYNOLDS

783 A.2d 724 (2001)

345 N.J. Super. 67

David CARTER and Donna Carter, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Alice F. REYNOLDS and Stevens, Fluhr, Chismar, Alvino & Schechter, CPA, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gercke, Dumser, Shoemaker & Sierzega, attorneys for appellant, Stevens, Fluhr, Chismar, Alvino & Schechter (Mr. Dumser on the brief).

Margolis, Edelstein, Westmont, attorneys for appellant, Alice F. Reynolds, joined in the brief of appellant Stevens, Fluhr, Chismar, Alvino & Schechter.

Tomar, O'Brien, Kaplan, Jacoby & Graziano, attorneys for respondents, (Alan H. Sklarsky, Cherry Hill, on the brief).

Before Judges BRAITHWAITE, COBURN, and WEISSBARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

The doctrine known as respondeat superior has been said to be "one of the few anomalies to the general tort doctrine of no liability without fault." Fruit v. Schreiner, 502 P.2d 133, 139 (Alaska 1972). Here we must address, in a different factual context, the ground covered recently in several opinions of this court. See Pfender v. Torres,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases