FOWLER v. CRYSTAL MOTORS, INC.

No. A-6956-99T5.

773 A.2d 730 (2001)

340 N.J. Super. 33

Caline FOWLER and Raymond Fowler, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRYSTAL MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 11, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seamus Boyle, Mountainside, argued the cause for appellants, (Weiseman, Hely, DiGioia & Boyle, attorneys; Mr. Boyle, on the brief).

John A. Camassa, Manasquan, argued the cause for respondent, (Connell & Connell, attorneys; Mr. Camassa, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KING, COBURN and LEFELT.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LEFELT, J.A.D.

The Legislature amended the verbal threshold statute in 1998 to modify significantly the limitation on the right to sue for non-economic damages. L.1998 c. 21, § 11. This appeal is controlled by the preexisting 1988 statute's definition of the verbal threshold and presents two issues. The first is whether plaintiff Caline Fowler presented sufficient evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases