1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 765 A.2d
  5. 765 A.2d 724 (2001)
 

IN RE CONVERY

765 A.2d 724 (2001)

166 N.J. 298

In the Matter of Samuel CONVERY, Jr., an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

John D. Arseneault, Chatham, argued the cause for respondent (Arseneault & Fassett, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises from a Motion for Final Discipline Based Upon a Criminal Conviction filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics ("OAE") before the Disciplinary Review Board ("DRB"). The OAE moved for final discipline against respondent Samuel V. Convery, Jr. pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c)(2). The OAE based its motion on respondent's conviction for promising employment or other benefit as consideration for any "political activity" in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases