HUNTSMAN v. HUNTSMAN

No. C1-00-1923.

633 N.W.2d 852 (2001)

In re the Marriage of James Richard HUNTSMAN, petitioner, Appellant, v. Zenith Annette HUNTSMAN, f/k/a Zenith Annette Morgan, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 4, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Richard Huntsman, pro se.

Law Offices of Brad C. Eggen, Brad C. Eggen, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This appeal arises from the marital dissolution of appellant James Richard Huntsman and respondent Zenith Annette Huntsman. Review of the underlying claims is not before this court. We granted review to decide the narrow question of whether the provision in Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 104.01, subd. 2, for the commencement of the appeal period applies where judgment has been entered on the order disposing of a proper and timely post-decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases