1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 773 A.2d
  5. 773 A.2d 711 (2001)
 

STATE v. YANOVSKY

773 A.2d 711 (2001)

340 N.J. Super. 1

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Igor YANOVSKY and Roman Krylov, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katharine L. Errickson, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Stephen B. Rubin, Hunterdon County Prosecutor, attorney; Ms. Errickson, of counsel and on the brief).

J. Michael Blake, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Roman Krylov (Peter A. Garcia, Acting Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Blake, of counsel and on the brief).

Respondent Igor Yanovsky did not file a brief.

Before Judges HAVEY, CUFF and LISA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LISA, J.A.D.

The State appeals, by leave granted, from an order suppressing evidence seized as a result of a consent search conducted in conjunction with a routine motor vehicle stop. The suppression was grounded upon a finding that the police lacked an articulable suspicion that the search would yield evidence of illegal activity and was therefore improper under the principles of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases