PRATT INV. CO. v. KENNEDY

No. C6-01-664.

636 N.W.2d 844 (2001)

PRATT INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. John D. KENNEDY, et al., Defendants, Lake Vadnais Free Church of St. Paul, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 18, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Alsop, Larry M. Wertheim, Bonnie L. Wilkins, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Fred A. Kueppers, Jr., Kueppers, Hackel & Kueppers, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, Presiding Judge, ANDERSON, Judge, and FOLEY, Judge.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY,* Judge.

In this boundary dispute, appellant challenges the referee's refusal to rule that it had acquired land via practical location of boundaries by acquiescence. Appellant alleges that the referee (1) misapplied the law by confusing the doctrine of practical location of boundaries by acquiescence with adverse possession, and (2) ignored evidence of acquiescence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases