STATE v. SCHRUPP

No. C3-00-1566.

625 N.W.2d 844 (2001)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Joel William SCHRUPP, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 15, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Kenneth N. Potts, Orono City Attorney, Wayzata, MN, for respondent.

Samuel A. McCloud, Kelly Vince Griffitts, Shakopee, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, RANDALL and PETERSON, Judges.


OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge

The district court ruled that an investigatory stop of appellant's motor vehicle was legal and denied appellant's motion to suppress the fruits of that stop. Appellant challenges the district court's ruling on the ground that the officer lacked an articulable suspicion of illegal activity. We reverse.

FACTS

In the district court, the parties stipulated that a police officer, stopped at an intersection in Orono, watched...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases