1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 779 A.2d
  5. 779 A.2d 655 (2001)
 

IN RE SCOTT

No. 99-544.

779 A.2d 655 (2001)

In re Grievance of Kevin SCOTT.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Stewart, Mark Heyman and Samuel C. Palmisano, VSEA Counsel, Montpelier, for Appellant.

William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, and William B. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Appellee.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.

AMESTOY, C.J.

State trooper Kevin Scott appeals the Vermont Labor Relations Board's dismissal of his grievances challenging disciplinary actions imposed upon him for his failure to pass the Vermont State Police physical fitness examination. On appeal, Scott claims that: 1) the Department of Public Safety's untimely investigation and notice procedures should result in the disciplinary actions being dropped; 2) the fitness policy discriminates against him because of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases