MYERS v. HEARTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C7-00-596.

621 N.W.2d 787 (2001)

Richard A. MYERS, et al., Respondents, v. HEARTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., f/k/a Heatilator, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Energy Plus, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 22, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Kreidler, Stich, Angell, Kreidler, Brownson & Ballou, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents Richard and Sandy Myers.

David M. Johnson, Thibodeau, Johnson, Feriancek & Costley, PLLP, Duluth, MN, for appellant.

John D. Kelly, Robin C. Merritt, Hanft Fride, P.A., Duluth, MN, for respondent Energy Plus.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, and AMUNDSON, Judge.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge

Respondents Richard A. and Sandy Myers (the Myers) sued appellant Hearth Technologies, Inc., f/k/a Heatilator, Inc., and respondent Energy Plus, Inc. for negligence and products liability. After a jury trial, the trial court denied directed verdict motions, and the jury found Hearth liable. Hearth moved for a new trial on several grounds, a new trial on damages, or for a remittitur. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases