FAIL v. HUBBARD

No. 99-15548.

272 F.3d 1133 (2001)

Essic FAIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Suzanne HUBBARD, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Resubmitted for Decision July 10, 2001.

Filed December 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew C. Bradford, Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, LLP, Sacramento, California, for the petitioner-appellant.

Gregory A. Ott, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, California, for the respondent-appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, WALLACE, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


Opinion by Chief Judge SCHROEDER; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:

Essic Fail appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. Although we deferred submission pending the Supreme Court's decision in Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 121 S.Ct. 2120, 150 L.Ed.2d 251 (2001), the Supreme Court did not deal directly with the issue this case now presents. That issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases