1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 132 F.Supp.2d
  5. 132 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2001)
 

GOLT v. CITY OF SIGNAL HILL

No. 00-6956 CM (SHX).

132 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2001)

David W. GOLT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, etc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

March 7, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Etan Z. Lorant, Etan Z Lorant Law Offices, Encino, CA, for plaintiff.

Glen E. Tucker, Daniel L. Morgan, Glen E. Tucker Law Offices, Pasadena, CA, for defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BROUGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56(b)

MORENO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendants City of Signal Hill, Signal Hill Police Department, and Officers Wolfe, Brown, Smith, Boksa and Chambers' Motion for Summary Judgment brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b). Having read and considered the moving papers, the opposition, and the reply, and all other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases