CRUMP v. KANSAS

No. CIV.A.97-3018-CM.

143 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2001)

Danny CRUMP, Plaintiff, v. State of KANSAS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

March 30, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danny Crump, Lansing, KS, Pro se.

James W. Coder, Office of Attorney General, Topeka, KS, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURGUIA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22). Because the court finds that (1) plaintiff has no liberty interest in parole pursuant to Kansas law, (2) the classifications applied by the state to the plaintiff are rationally related to a governmental interest and therefore do not constitute a violation of plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases