1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 632 N.W.2d
  5. 632 N.W.2d 748 (2001)
 

PROLIFE MINNESOTA v. MINNESOTA PRO-LIFE

No. C2-00-2160.

632 N.W.2d 748 (2001)

PROLIFE MINNESOTA, Respondent, v. MINNESOTA PRO-LIFE COMMITTEE, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Shoemaker, Shoemaker Law Office, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, (for respondent).

Harlan M. Goulett, Harlan M. Goulett & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, (for appellants).

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, RANDALL, Judge, and G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge

This is an appeal from a temporary restraining order in which the district court enjoined appellants from using the name "Minnesota Pro-Life Committee," which is similar to the name of respondent's organization, "Prolife Minnesota." Respondent's name is protected under trademark law. Appellants contend that this violates their First-Amendment rights because they were not offered an opportunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases