HAEFELE v. HAEFELE

No. C4-00-670.

621 N.W.2d 758 (2001)

In re the Marriage of Jean K. HAEFELE, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Richard J. HAEFELE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 21, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Larry Katz, Elizabeth Boleyn Bowling, Katz & Manka, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, (for respondent).

Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, (for appellant).

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.


OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellant argues the district court (1) abused its discretion by reopening the dissolution judgment and by improperly valuing and dividing marital property; (2) deprived him of due process of law by combining the proceeding to reopen the judgment with the evidentiary hearing on the property division questions; and (3) abused its discretion by awarding respondent need-based and conduct-based attorney fees. Because the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases