1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 264 F.3d
  5. 264 F.3d 1111 (2001)
 

TURBOCARE DIV. OF DEMAG DELAVAL v. GENERAL ELEC.

No. 00-1349.

264 F.3d 1111 (2001)

TURBOCARE DIVISION OF DEMAG DELAVAL TURBOMACHINERY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catriona M. Collins, Cohen, Potani, Lieberman & Pavane, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were Francis J. Murphy and John M. Calimafde, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil & Judlowe LLP, of New York, NY.

Mark T. Banner, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the were Christopher J. Renk, Thomas K. Pratt and Janice V. Mitrius.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

The TurboCare Division of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. ("TurboCare") is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 4,436,311 ("the '311 patent"), which is directed to a shaft sealing system for fluid turbines. TurboCare brought suit against General Electric Co. ("GE") in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, asserting infringement of the '311 patent. The district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement as to claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases