1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 780 A.2d
  5. 780 A.2d 593 (2001)
 

D'ONOFRIO v. D'ONOFRIO

780 A.2d 593 (2001)

344 N.J. Super. 147

Donato A. D'ONOFRIO II, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cindi A. D'ONOFRIO, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. John Germann, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (DeNoia and Tambasco, attorneys; Mr. Germann, on the brief).

Margaret Goodzeit, Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, attorneys; Ms. Goodzeit and Cipora Winters, Iselin, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and PARRILLO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, J.A.D.

Defendant Cindi D'Onofrio appeals a final judgment that restricted her rights as joint legal custodian of the parties' four children, awarded her unsupervised parenting time on a specific schedule, and designated plaintiff Donato D'Onofrio as the primary caretaker responsible for making day-to-day decisions regarding the children as well as final decisions on all major issues affecting them where agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases