1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 27 P.3d
  5. 27 P.3d 110 (2001)
 

DeYOUNG/THOMAS v. BOARD OF PAROLE

(CA A106889, A105130; SC S47467, S47322)

27 P.3d 110 (2001)

332 Or. 266

Dennis Martin DeYOUNG, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. Edward Andrew Thomas, Petitioner on Review, v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 6, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Carroll, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the brief were David E. Groom, State Public Defender, and Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender.

Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.

GILLETTE, J.

These two petitions, consolidated for briefing, argument, and opinion, seek review of dismissals by the Court of Appeals of petitions for judicial review of orders issued by the Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision (Board). The petitions challenge the dismissal orders of the Court of Appeals only to the extent that they designate the Board as the prevailing party on appeal and allow costs—specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases