STATE v. BRENNAN


780 A.2d 585 (2001)

344 N.J. Super. 136

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William BRENNAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 28, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Brennan, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Pia S. Perez, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (William H. Schmidt, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Ms. Perez, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and PARRILLO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CIANCIA, J.A.D.

Defendant William Brennan was charged with disrupting a public meeting, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-8, and defiant trespass, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-3b. He was found guilty of both offenses in municipal court and appealed to the Superior Court, Law Division. After a trial de novo on the record, Judge Joseph Conte found defendant guilty of defiant trespass, but not guilty of disrupting a public meeting. Appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases