1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 180 F.Supp.2d
  5. 180 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2001)
 

DACOSTA v. NOVARTIS AG

No. CV 01-800-BR.

180 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2001)

Rosemary S. DACOSTA and Ricardo S. Dacosta, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. NOVARTIS AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Leonard Weaver, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

August 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Williams, Brian S. Campf, Leslie W. O'Leary, Williams Dailey & O'Leary, P.C., Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs.

Mark H. Wagner, Kenneth D. Renner, Ruth Cabby Rocker, Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LP, Portland, David W. Fowler, Frank Leone, Jr., Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Andrea Kochan Neagle, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, for Defendants Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Leonard Weaver.

Paul T. Fortino, Erick J. Haynie, Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendant Novartis AG.

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(# 7) and Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Exhibits (# 10). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is DENIED without prejudice with leave to renew, and Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals's Motion to Strike is DENIED.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases