1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 104 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 31 (2001)
 

PEOPLE v. PARMAR

No. C032818.

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 31 (2001)

86 Cal.App.4th 781

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Prakash Vallabhdas PARMAR et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Review Denied April 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan Scully, District Attorney, Albert C. Locher, Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paulino Duran, Public Defender, Michael R. Nelson, Assistant Public Defender, for Defendant and Respondent Rosemary Parmar.

C. Emmett Mahle, for Defendant and Respondent Prakash Vallabhdas Parmer.

Barry & Randolph, Michelle J. Gray, and Adrian L. Randolph, Sacramento, for Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

SCOTLAND, P.J.

Upon certification by the Appellate Division of the Sacramento County Superior Court, we ordered this appeal transferred to this court in order to settle an important question of law. (Pen. Code, § 1471.)

The defendants, Prakash Vallabhdas Parmar and Rosemary Parmar, are facing a 250-count misdemeanor complaint arising out of their ownership and operation of two contiguous motels on Auburn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases