STATE v. OBERG

No. C2-00-1476.

627 N.W.2d 721 (2001)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mark Charles OBERG, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 5, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Kelly O'Neill Moller, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Richard R. Maes, Lyon County Attorney, Marshall, MN, (for respondent).

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Theodora K. Gaitas, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, (for appellant).

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, ANDERSON and FOLEY, Judges.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Mark Charles Oberg was convicted of controlled substance crime in the third degree. He challenges the district court's sentencing determinations. Oberg claims that the district court erred in calculating his criminal history score, in declining to grant a downward dispositional departure, and by imposing a fine that violated the Excessive Fines Clauses of the state and federal constitutions. We affirm in part, reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases