1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 244 F.3d
  5. 244 F.3d 1092 (2001)
 

U.S. v. MATSUMARU

No. 99-10334.

244 F.3d 1092 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sho Jay MATSUMARU, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 3, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Osterhoudt, Law Offices of William L. Osterhoudt, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Omer G. Poirier, United States Attorney's Office, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: PROCTER HUG, JR., Chief Judge, STEPHEN S. TROTT, and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted November 13, 2000 — Honolulu, Hawaii

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

It's been said that "good counsellors lack no clients." WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, MEASURE FOR MEASURE act I, sc.2. Sho Jay Matsumaru certainly did not lack clients, but according to the government, it was not because he was a "good counsellor." To the contrary, the government characterizes Matsumaru as a cunning, sophisticated lawyer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases