1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 620 N.W.2d
  5. 620 N.W.2d 714 (2001)
 

IN RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST HOEDEMAN

No. C2-00-862.

620 N.W.2d 714 (2001)

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Alfred L. HOEDEMAN, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 18, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Cleary, Director, Betty M. Shaw, Senior Assistant Director, Office of Lawyer's Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, for Petitioner.

Alfred L. Hoedeman, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding follows the failure of respondent Alfred L. Hoedeman to comply with the terms of his private probation and to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB). In the absence of any factors justifying mitigation, we conclude that indefinite suspension from the practice of law is the appropriate sanction.

Since Hoedeman was admitted to the practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases