1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 767 A.2d
  5. 767 A.2d 564 (2001)
 

ARONSON v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.

767 A.2d 564 (2001)

Mark B. ARONSON and Joseph G., Kanfoush, Appellant, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., and Sprint, Communications Company, L.P. Each Individually and Doing Business as Sprint, Sprint PCS and Sprint Personal Communication Services, Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed January 16, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark B. Aronson and Joseph G. Kanfoush, appellants, pro se.

W. Gregory Rhodes, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

BEFORE: KELLY, MUSMANNO, and ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Mark B. Aronson and Joseph G. Kanfoush, ask us to determine whether the trial court properly dismissed their single count equity complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We hold that Sprint's wireless services provider, Sprint Spectrum, is not regulated by the Commonwealth and that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") is the proper forum to address Appellants' claim. We further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases