CULBERTSON v. OAKRIDGE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 76

No. 99-35165.

258 F.3d 1061 (2001)

Mae CULBERTSON; Ladette Armstrong, individually and as guardian ad litem for Tyler Armstrong; Marsha Hall, individually and as guardian ad litem for Matthew Hall; Mary Tommila, individually and as guardian ad litem for Jacinda Tommila and Keaira Tommila; Child Evangelism Fellowship of Oregon, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OAKRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 76; Larry Horton, in his official capacity as Superintendent; Opinion Michael Keown, in his official capacity as former Superintendent; Michael Lambert, in his official capacity as former Principal of Oakridge Elementary School; Jane McAlvage, in her official capacity as Principal of Oakridge Elementary School; Don Crist; Curtis Dornath; Pam Moody, Susan Obermeyer; and John Whettle, in their official capacities as directors of the Oakridge School District No. 76, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Withdrawn August 22, 2000.

Submitted July 27, 2001.

Filed August 7, 2001


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lisa E. Lear, John R. Osburn, and Chrys A. Martin, Bullivant Houser Bailey, Portland, Oregon, for appellants Oakridge School District et al.

Gregory S. Baylor, Western Center for Law & Religious Freedom, Annandale, Virginia; Herbert G. Grey, Western Center for Law & Religious Freedom, Beaverton, Oregon; Darren C. Walker, Western Center for Law & Religious Freedom, Vancouver, Washington, for appellees Mae Culbertson et al.

Susan J. Veis, Los Angeles, California, for Amicus Curiae Anti-Defamation League.

Before: John T. NOONAN, Susan P. GRABER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.


Submitted July 27, 2001 — Portland, Oregon

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Oakridge School District No. 76 and individual school authorities in their official capacities (collectively the District) appeal the judgment of the district court in favor of Mae Culbertson, certain parents, and the Child Evangelism Fellowship of Oregon (collectively CEF). The district court entered a permanent injunction requiring the District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases