1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 237 F.3d
  5. 237 F.3d 1080 (2001)
 

SNEAD v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CAS. INS. CO.

No. 99-35071.

237 F.3d 1080 (2001)

Emily SNEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; James McIntosh, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 23, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott N. Hunt, Esq., Busse & Hunt, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Andrew M. Altschul, Esq., Stoel Rives, Portland, Oregon, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: Donald P. LAY, A. Wallace TASHIMA, and M. Margaret McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge LAY

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

The underlying question we must decide in this employment discrimination case arising under Oregon law is whether plaintiff Emily Snead ("Snead") adduced sufficient evidence to survive her employer's, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("Met"), motion for summary judgment. We must first decide, however, the threshold question of whether this action is governed by Oregon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases