Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment of divorce, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in awarding defendant $35,685.50 as her marital share of the appreciation of plaintiff's interests in three closely-held businesses. We disagree. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the court took into account the fact that plaintiff was only a part owner of the businesses, and did not award defendant a share of the total...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
