REGENTS OF UNIV. OF MINNESOTA v. RAYGOR

No. C1-99-1140.

620 N.W.2d 680 (2001)

REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Lance RAYGOR and James Goodchild, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 4, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Rotenberg, General Counsel, Lorie S. Gildea, Associate General Counsel, Minneapolis, MN, Andrew Parker, Matthew E. Johnson, Smith Parker, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Howard L. Bolter, Borkon, Ramstead, Mariani & Letourneau, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether the tolling provision of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) (1993), applies to toll the statute of limitations for Minnesota Human Rights Act claims against the Regents of the University of Minnesota during the time the state law claims were pending in federal court. Respondents Lance Raygor and James Goodchild brought this action against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases