1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 777 A.2d
  5. 777 A.2d 519 (2001)
 

COM. v. FUNDS IN MERRILL LYNCH ACCOUNT

777 A.2d 519 (2001)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. FUNDS IN MERRILL LYNCH ACCOUNT, OWNED BY Rennick PEART Nos. 870-56483 and 870-67056; Funds in Corestates Bank Account, Owned by Rennick Peart, No. 20698485; Funds in Fidelity Bank Corp., Owned by Rennick Peart and S and S Records, Inc., No. 3078227; Funds in Germantown Bank, Owned by Rennick Peart, No. 30-907735; $1338.00 U.S. Currency Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed in Pr #510589; $10,283.00 U.S. Currency Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed on Pr # 510591; Miscellaneous Jewelry Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed on Pr #510593 Real Property and Improvements Known as 5703 Chester Avenue, Ex Rel, Rennick Peart, Rennick PEART, Appellant. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Rennick Peart, Appellant. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Funds In Merrill Lynch Account, Owned By Rennick Peart Nos. 870-56483 and 870-67056; Funds in Corestates Bank Account, Owned by Rennick Peart, No. 20698485; Funds in Fidelity Bank Corp., Owned by Rennick Peart and S and S Records, Inc., No. 3078227; Funds in Germantown Bank, Owned by Rennick Peart, No. 30-907735; $1338.00 U.S. Currency Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed in Pr # 510589; $10,283.00 U.S. Currency Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed on Pr # 510591; Miscellaneous Jewelry Seized from Rennick Peart and Listed on Pr # 510593 Real Property and Improvements Known as 5703 Chester Avenue, Ex Rel, Rennick Peart. Rennick Peart, Appellant.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 4, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert B. Abramson and Michael B. Tolcott, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Jonathan M. Levy, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before DOYLE, President Judge, SMITH, J., and McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

SMITH, Judge.

Rennick Peart (Appellant) appeals from three orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County relating to the forfeiture of various property, currency and funds that the court found to have been used in a criminal enterprise involving the sale and distribution of drug paraphernalia. Appellant contends that the court erred in admitting certain evidence due to defects in the issuance and the execution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases