McINTYRE v. PHOTINOS

97-2188-E-1; A107053

28 P.3d 1259 (2001)

175 Or. App. 478

Martha McINTYRE, Respondent, v. Panos J. PHOTINOS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 1, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt H. Knudsen, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Lombard, Knudsen & Holtey, LLP.

David V. Gilstrap, Ashland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Davis, Gilstrap, Hearn, Saladoff & Smith, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and LANDAU and KISTLER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant and plaintiff are neighboring property owners. Defendant appeals from a judgment declaring plaintiff to be the owner by adverse possession of a strip of land that is within the described boundaries of his property. ORS 105.620. He contends that the evidence is not sufficient to support the trial court's ruling. We review de novo and reverse.

Plaintiff's and defendant's properties were originally owned by a single grantor, Ochs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases