1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 628 N.W.2d
  5. 628 N.W.2d 643 (2001)
 

KOLTON v. COUNTY OF ANOKA

No. C1-00-2179.

628 N.W.2d 643 (2001)

Gloria L. KOLTON, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ANOKA, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent, v. Allan T. Roth, individually and d/b/a A.T. Group, Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne J. Rice, the Law Office of Wayne J. Rice, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert M.A. Johnson, Anoka County Attorney, Robert D. Goodell, Assistant County Attorney, Anoka, for respondent Anoka County.

Frederick E. Finch, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent Roth.

James F. Roegge, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis; and Mark E. Schmidtke, Hoeppner, Wagner & Evans, L.L.P., Valparaiso, IN, for respondent Sun Life.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, P.J., SCHUMACHER and PORITSKY, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Gloria L. Kolton challenges adverse summary judgment, arguing that the district court erred in ruling she did not establish Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and equal protection claims as a matter of law. We affirm summary judgment on equal protection but reverse judgment on her statutory claim.

FACTS

Respondent County of Anoka employed appellant as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases