Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 20.00, 140.25 [2]) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law §§ 20.00, 155.30 [1]). We reject defendant's contention that the pretrial identification of defendant by a prosecution witness should have been suppressed and that the witness's subsequent in-court identification...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
