The sole question to be decided in this medical malpractice case is whether a medical expert's testimony adequately specified the applicable standard of care and a breach of that standard in accordance with 18 Del. C. § 6853. The Superior Court trial judge found that the expert's testimony was deficient in both respects and granted the defendant doctor's motion for judgment as a matter of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.