1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 260 F.3d
  5. 260 F.3d 997 (2001)
 

LEE v. AMERICAN NAT. INS. CO.

No. 99-15846.

260 F.3d 997 (2001)

Howard M. LEE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; American National Insurance Company of Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 8, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marie Seth Weiner, Cotchett, Pitre & Simon, Burlingame, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

James M. Wagstaffe, Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted November 13, 2000 — San Francisco, California

Opinion by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether, in a diversity action removed from state court, the entire case must be remanded if the plaintiff lacks Article III standing as to one of several defendants. We conclude that the case need not be remanded, and therefore affirm the district court's denial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases