OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATION, INC. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT


767 A.2d 488 (2001)

337 N.J. Super. 398

OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATION, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, Defendant/Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 23, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory J. Czura, Ringwood, argued the cause for appellant (Czura Stilwell, attorneys; Mr. Czura, on the brief).

John Lore, Dunellen, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges BAIME and WALLACE, Jr.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WALLACE, Jr., J.A.D.

Plaintiff Omnipoint Communications, Inc. appeals from the denial of its application for a conditional-use variance to construct a monopole for wireless telecommunications services by defendant Board of Adjustment of the Township of Bedminster (Board). Plaintiff filed an action in lieu of prerogative writs in the Law Division. The trial judge upheld the action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases