U.S. v. LAHUE

Nos. 99-3344, 99-3347 and 99-3352.

261 F.3d 993 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. LaHUE, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dan Anderson, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald H. LaHUE, Defendant-Appellant. The American Hospital Association; Federation of American Health Systems; Association of American Medical Colleges; American Osteopathic Association; Missouri Hospital Association; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amici Curiae.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 17, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tanya J. Treadway; Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, Topeka, KS; William H. Bowne, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with her on the brief, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bruce C. Houdek of Bruce C. Houdek, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for defendant-appellant Robert C. LaHue.

James R. Wyrsch; Keith E. Drill, Jacqueline A. Cook, and Cheryl A. Pilate with him on the briefs, of Wyrsch Hobbs Mirakian & Lee, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for defendant-appellant Dan Anderson.

Jeffrey D. Morris of Bryan Cave LLP, Overland Park, KS, for defendant-appellant Ronald H. LaHue.

Thomas S. Crane, Tracy A. Minder, Jeffrey D. Clements and Theresa M. Claffey, of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA, filed an amici curiae brief for The American Hospital Association, Federation of American Health Systems, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Osteopathic Association, Missouri Hospital Association.

Vicki Mandell-King, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Denver, Colorado; Barbara E. Bergman, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Albuquerque, NM; Philip C. Zimmerman of Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, CO, filed an amicus curiae brief for National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Before ANDERSON, BALDOCK and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

These matters are before the court on appellants' petitions for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc. The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The petitions for rehearing en banc were transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service as required by Fed.R.App.P. 35. As no member of the panel and no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled, those petitions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases