1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 247 F.3d
  5. 247 F.3d 1003 (2001)
 

BABY TAM & CO., INC. v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS

No. 00-16123.

247 F.3d 1003 (2001)

BABY TAM & CO, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 26, 2001

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Stein, Esq., Michael Stein & Associates, Ltd., Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Bradford R. Jerbic, City Attorney, William P. Henry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Philip R. Byrnes, Deputy City Attorney, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the defendant-appellee.

Before: Stephen REINHARDT, John T. NOONAN and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted March 19, 2001 — San Francisco, California

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Baby Tam & Co., Inc. (Baby Tam) appeals the order of the district court denying it relief in its suit against the City of Las Vegas (the City) in regard to the City's zoning and licensing scheme. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The prior history of this case is set out in our two earlier decisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases