Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress the statements he made to the police. The testimony at the suppression hearing supports the court's finding that the statements were voluntarily given. That testimony established that there was no causal connection between any injuries defendant received at the time of the arrest and the statement taken hours later (see, People v Gomez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
